Silence the noise.
SOC Alert Triage & Automated Investigation
Your eight-person SOC shouldn't be triaging 14,000 alerts a week. With Investigation Agents drafting case files, that number drops to ninety, and every one deserves a decision.
Silence the noise.
Your eight-person SOC shouldn't be triaging 14,000 alerts a week. With Investigation Agents drafting case files, that number drops to ninety, and every one deserves a decision.
The modern SOC is a queue of alerts no one person can hold in their head. Analysts pivot across seven tools to understand one event. Burnout is the predictable outcome, and real threats slip through in the noise.
Alert overload isn't the disease. It's what you feel when a SOC built for a slower, smaller, more static world meets an environment that is none of those things. Three cracks sit underneath it.
The SIEM bargain broke. As ingest costs climbed, telemetry spread to data lakes, point tools, and homegrown stores. The signal you need now lives across systems that were never meant to talk.
Hand-written rules assume a frozen environment. The moment context shifts, with a new app, a reorg, or a migration, they drift into false positives or quiet blind spots no one is watching.
Attacks move at machine speed; manual triage does not. Between alert volume, skill gaps, and stretched MSSPs, most SOCs can't open every alert, let alone investigate it.
In its first hours, Anzenna reads your environment and builds a security context graph: a living map of people, systems, ownership, and every decision your team has made. It is the knowledge source the Investigation Agents reason over, and it never stops growing.
Identity, endpoint, SaaS, and email, alongside tickets, SOPs, ownership, and the history of past investigations. Structured tables and messy documents alike.
Anzenna connects the dots, turning raw records into memories: a canonical answer to the questions every investigation ends up asking.
A living map of how your environment really works: who owns what, what's normal for whom, how cases like this were closed before.
Agents pull from the graph to investigate in minutes. Every case they close flows back, sharpening the memory for the next one.
The Investigation Agent reads every signal: identity, endpoint, SaaS, email, and behavior, and writes the case before you open it: narrative, evidence, confidence, recommendation.
Every alert is weighted against the peer-group baseline. An engineer pulling their own repos is normal. An engineer pulling every repo in the org is not. Anzenna knows the difference.
Analysts start their morning with a short list of cases, each inspectable, each auditable, each closeable in minutes.
Your most experienced analysts hold the tribal knowledge that actually runs the SOC: which alerts matter, which apps are known exceptions, how each kind of case really gets closed. When they leave, that institutional memory usually walks out with them. Anzenna captures it in a living security context graph, so your team's capability compounds instead of resetting to zero.
Every closed case feeds the context graph: the evidence weighed, the exceptions that apply, the decision your team reached and the reasoning behind it.
When a familiar pattern returns, the Investigation Agent draws on your institutional memory, how your team handled it last time, rather than a blank slate.
New analysts inherit the context graph and every accumulated call. Capability builds with each closed case instead of resetting with every departure.
Security spend is hard to defend with anecdotes. Anzenna turns the queue into a trend you can take upstairs: coverage climbing, response time falling, the backlog disappearing, month over month, in numbers leadership understands.
My team isn't firefighting anymore. They're investigating, deciding, resting. That's what security should feel like.
Fifteen-minute install. Read-only by default. No agents on endpoints.
Thirty minutes. Your environment, not our slides.
Request a walkthrough ↗