Comparison · Anzenna vs. DTEX
Past the endpoint.DTEX reads the device. Anzenna reasons across the stack.
DTEX anchors insider risk to a lightweight endpoint forwarder. Anzenna is fully agentless, reasoning over behavior, identity, and context across 130+ identity, SaaS, cloud, and endpoint sources, with nothing to deploy to the device.
Where DTEX stays on the endpoint, Anzenna sees the whole identity.
DTEX collects high-fidelity behavioral metadata from a lightweight forwarder on each device, then correlates ingested sources in the cloud. Anzenna starts from identity and reasons across your entire stack agentlessly, so SaaS, cloud, and identity risk surfaces even when it never touches a managed endpoint.
| Capability | Anzenna | DTEX |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment model | Agentless. Live across 130+ sources in minutes | Lightweight endpoint forwarder per device, plus cloud ingest |
| Primary signal | Identity, SaaS, cloud, endpoint & data, unified | Endpoint behavioral metadata, enriched with ingested sources |
| Endpoint agent for full visibility | ✗ | ✓ |
| SaaS, identity & cloud threat coverage | Native across 130+ sources, no endpoint required | Correlated via ingest, anchored to endpoint telemetry |
| Autonomous investigation to a complete case file | ✓ | Agentic assistants augment analyst review |
| Behavioral baselines per person & peer group | ✓ | ✓ |
| Read-only metadata, no content capture | ✓ | ✓ |
| Time to value | Minutes, no fleet rollout | Endpoint deployment across the fleet |
| Alert fatigue | 90% fewer alerts; analysts review decisions | Reduced noise via behavioral scoring |
The case for going agentless.
What changes when insider risk is reasoned across the whole stack, not collected device by device. Composite figures from production deployments across the last twelve months.
90%
Fewer alerts surface to analysts. Signal without the shouting.
130+
Integrations, agentless and ready. From Okta to GitHub, M365 to Snowflake.
<2 min
Median time from signal to a complete case file, with all evidence gathered and ready for review.
72%
Of tickets auto-remediated or auto-escalated. Analysts review decisions, not haystacks.
FAQ
Honest answers.
How is Anzenna different from DTEX?+
DTEX is built around the endpoint. It runs a lightweight forwarder on each device to collect behavioral metadata, then enriches it in the cloud. Anzenna is agentless. It reasons over behavior, identity, and context across 130+ identity, SaaS, cloud, and endpoint sources without deploying anything to the device, so you see authorized-but-risky activity wherever it happens, not just on managed endpoints.
Does Anzenna need an endpoint agent like DTEX?+
No. Anzenna connects through read-only API access to the systems you already run, from Okta and Microsoft 365 to GitHub and Snowflake. There is no forwarder to package, no fleet rollout, and no device coverage gaps for unmanaged or contractor machines.
DTEX has agentic defenders now. What does Anzenna add?+
DTEX's agentic assistants help analysts triage and hunt over endpoint-anchored telemetry. Anzenna runs the full investigation autonomously across your whole stack, assembling a prioritized, fully-reasoned case file with evidence gathered and ready for review. The breadth of context, not just the endpoint, is what changes the answer.
Can Anzenna cover SaaS and identity threats an endpoint tool may miss?+
Yes. Because Anzenna is grounded in identity and SaaS signals natively, it surfaces risks that never touch a managed endpoint: OAuth grants to risky apps, identity misuse, shadow AI usage, and data movement inside cloud services. An endpoint-first tool sees these only when they pass through an instrumented device.
Is Anzenna itself secure?+
Yes. Anzenna uses read-only access to metadata only, is revocable by the customer at any time, and is SOC 2 Type II certified and Microsoft 365 security certified, including an independent compliance assessment and pentest by Microsoft.
See risk beyond the endpoint.
Thirty minutes. Your environment. No agent to install.